Now that opposing views have been shown one thing is clear, that the way in which we use capital punishments is not perfect.
The trial costs and processes would always require money but nowhere near the costs due to legal fees thanks to the Supreme Court. The existence of some systemic problems is no reason to abandon the whole death penalty system.
Inthe Supreme Court began imposing various exclusionary rules for confessions and search-and-seizure and creating the lengthy appeals process William, However, Anders Breivik, the Man who recently killed 67 in cold blood is only facing life in prison for his crimes due to Sweden not having a death penalty.
After accepting that innocent people are wrongly convicted, the next logical question is how often this is this happening and why is this happening. However, there will always be inaccuracy with any system such as eyewitnesses being wrong, perjury, and having a poor defense.
No one expects the prosecutor to pursue every possible offense or punishment, nor do we expect the same sentence to be imposed just because two crimes appear similar. The death penalty should apply to killers of black people as well as to killers of whites.
In fact, more white people are executed in this country than black people.
Even if the death penalty punishes some while sparing others, it does not follow that everyone should be spared. But then again, what system is perfect where there are no inefficiencies and we always get the bad guy. Nobody wants to see innocent people get the death penalty but to get rid of death penalty all together is Is the death penalty applied fairly not right because the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.
As much as these numbers help support the deterrent theory, this author considers them a weak argument that does not tell the whole story.
In the end, the number of mistakes that happen are minimal and vast majority of the child rapist and killers will get a punishment that fits their crimes.
This is deeply troubling until you see the amount of convictions that have happened since There actually has been some statistical numbers which do in fact support this. And even if blacks are disproportionately represented on death row, proportionately blacks commit more murders than whites.
Each crime is unique, both because the circumstances of each victim are different and because each defendant is different.
The solutions are easy and they involve the shortening of the appeal process and some other minor things that cost a lot of money. The guilty should still be punished appropriately, even if some do escape proper punishment unfairly. This is a case where he would face the death penalty if the state where he was tried had a death penalty.
Those who support the death penalty cite that the use of capital punishment deters others from committing their horrible crimes.
High paid, skillful lawyers should not be able to get some defendants off on technicalities. The Supreme Court did legalize capital punishment in but some believe that it took time for people to realize what their crimes could do to them William, The United States is the last industrialize nation to use the death penalty and many belief that it is barbaric Keil, The cost of the death penalty is reason that many people use as a reason to not use capital punishment but not many people ask why it is so high.
The answer is yes and one could argue that the state should in fact carry this out or else the victims and their families will not have justice. Since there have been cases were people who were convicted and given a sentence of death who were later exonerated Keil, Supreme Court has held that a mandatory death penalty which applied to everyone convicted of first degree Is the death penalty applied fairly would be unconstitutional.
Moreover, the Supreme Court has rejected the use of statistical studies which claim racial bias as the sole reason for overturning a death sentence. More Essay Examples on Crime Rubric While the thought of having someone put to death is not something that anyone would like, the death penalty is the only way for ultimate justice to be administered for victims provided that it is fairly administered.
Hence, we must give prosecutors and juries some discretion. The actual cost of the death penalty varies state by state but it averages out to 1. Homicide rates peaked in, and Zimmerman, Many people who oppose the death penalty will be quick to point to the people who are innocent but still convicted.
What has been learned is that we do not fully know how effective of a deterrence the death penalty has on society. To start off, the death penalty is not normally sought unless the crime is egregious. But the question is why is the cost so high.
The death penalty is applied fairly and may be used. The question that has to be asked is that are we morally right to end the life of another when we know that they have in fact taken life. These are called crimes of passion and they happen when people do not think about the consequences of their actions.
There is also sociological data that shows crimes in relation to population age and unwanted pregnancies Zimmerman, Discretion has always been an essential part of our system of justice. This is a staggering cost when you compare it to taking care of an inmate for life, which has a median cost ofdollars Zimmerman, Dec 14, · Aside from the question of the popularity of capital punishment, critics say, the problem with the death penalty in New Jersey is that too often it is not applied fairly.
Questions of Fairness. Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly? Capital punishment has been used around the world for many thousands of years as a way of enforcing justice when someone has done wrong by what standards that the cultures have - Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?
introduction. Death Penalty Applied to Juveniles In a sixteen year old boy was put to death for sodomizing a cow. Three hundred and fifty years later, sixteen states have legitimized the execution of juveniles. The Death Penalty: Just or Fairly? Edmond Dowling Jr. PHI Instructor Kelly Mink October 10, Is the Death Penalty just and applied fairly?
Outline Introduction Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people.
Race and the Application of the Death Penalty. Questions of whether or not the death penalty was applied fairly along racial lines surfaced in McCleskey v.
McCleskey argued that there was racial discrimination in the application of Georgia's death penalty. Generally speaking, do you believe the death penalty is applied fairly or unfairly in this country today?
Are you in favor of the death penalty for a person convicted of murder? If you could choose between the following two approaches, which do you think is the better penalty for murder -- [ROTATED: the death penalty (or) life imprisonment.Download